Heatwave like a record year
Heat at the intensity of the worst year in each place’s observed record, applied to every site in the book at once.
Combine physical shocks with NGFS transition scenarios and see what they do to probability of default, expected credit loss and CET1 capital, with every number traceable to the hazard, the scenario and the data delivery behind it.
Each physical shock is defined against observed history or a named return period, so “severe” means something you can point to: the hottest year in a place’s record, a drought like a year your credit committee remembers, the flood depth expected once in a hundred years.
Heat at the intensity of the worst year in each place’s observed record, applied to every site in the book at once.
Pick a drought year from the record and replay it across the book, measured with the Standardised Precipitation Index.
Rainfall at a chosen return period and the flood depth it produces at each site, from 2D modelling on bare-earth terrain.
A severe fire season expressed through the fire risk score at each site, for agricultural, forestry and peri-urban assets.
Peak ground acceleration at the 1-in-475 year level, the reference return period used in seismic design.
Landslide susceptibility under a wet season, where slope, soil and rainfall meet on the terrain model.
Sustained heat and humidity that slow outdoor work and raise cooling loads, measured with comfort and humidex indicators and WBGT.
Net Zero 2050, Delayed Transition, Current Policies or NDCs, turned into carbon cost, revenue and credit impact for each counterparty.
A scenario is a physical shock at a chosen severity, an NGFS transition pathway and a time horizon. Physical and transition risk are kept as two dimensions all the way through, so the result shows which one is doing the damage.
Every stage is stored and inspectable, not just the final number. Here is one counterparty, CP-0417, under ST-0147: open any link in the console to see the inputs, the range and the version it came from.
The shock is resolved at each site: here, depth at the 1-in-100 year level from 2D modelling on terrain.
1.1 m range 0.8–1.4 m, site S‑2207Sites are matched to the counterparties and facilities in your book that depend on them.
R 240 m drawn exposure · 2 facilitiesPhysical and transition effects on the counterparty, kept apart so each can be read on its own.
−7.5% revenue + R 14 m carbon cost a yearThe weaker financial position moves the counterparty’s PD and, where it crosses a band, its severity.
1.8% → 3.1% At risk → StressedPD meets exposure and loss given default to give the uplift in expected credit loss.
+R 6.2 m range 4.4–8.3 mLoss flows through to the CET1 ratio, summed across the book with every counterparty’s share visible.
−0.4 bps of −62 bps for the bookAll values for CP-0417 and site S-2207 are synthetic Illustrative
Expected credit loss and CET1 impact are reported with a range, not a point, and split by source. A board can see that a scenario costs 62 basis points of CET1 and that 38 of them come from the flood.
Analysts need room to try things; supervisors need to know which number is the real one. ecosphere keeps the two apart, and pins every run to the exact data it read so the result can be reproduced next quarter.
Try a different severity, swap the transition pathway, narrow the book to one sector. Exploratory runs are clearly labelled wherever they appear and never reach a report by accident.
An official run is the one your institution stands behind. It reads pinned deliveries, is reviewed by a second person, and is the only kind that exports as a scenario report of record.
A run records the version of every delivery it read: hazard indicators, flood depths, NGFS pathways and your own counterparty book. When a newer delivery is published, the pinned run does not move until you choose to rerun it.
Any figure, from a single PD to the CET1 total, links back through the results chain to the deliveries it was computed from, with their source, version and reviewer.
The scenario report sets out the scenario definition, the deliveries read, results by portfolio and counterparty, and the ranges around them, ready for risk committee and supervisory review.
In a working session we run a sample of your counterparties through a physical shock and a transition scenario, and walk you through every step of the chain from hazard to capital.