Net Zero 2050
Climate policies tighten early and steadily, reaching net zero around 2050. Carbon costs rise soon, but predictably, giving counterparties time to adjust.
Four NGFS scenarios, Net Zero 2050, Delayed Transition, Current Policies and NDCs, translated into carbon cost, revenue and credit impact for every counterparty in your book, and reported in your organisation’s own currency.
| Counterparty | Carbon cost | Revenue | PD Δ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement producer | R 520 m | −6.8% | +41 | Stressed |
| Coal-fired IPP | R 610 m | −11.2% | +88 | Stranded |
| Fertiliser plant | R 164 m | −3.1% | +19 | At risk |
| Retail REIT | R 22 m | −0.4% | +2 | Low |
The Network for Greening the Financial System scenarios are the reference supervisors use. We carry four of them, so the same counterparty can be read under an orderly, a disorderly and a hot-house world without changing tools.
Climate policies tighten early and steadily, reaching net zero around 2050. Carbon costs rise soon, but predictably, giving counterparties time to adjust.
Little changes until 2030, then policy has to move fast. The late, sharp jump in carbon cost is where credit impact tends to be largest.
Only the policies already in place are kept. Transition costs stay low, and physical risk carries the weight instead.
Countries deliver the Nationally Determined Contributions they have pledged, including those of the African countries where your counterparties operate.
A scenario is only useful when it reaches the line your committee approves. Transition risk follows each counterparty through three measures.
Blending them into a single score hides what to do about either. A maize cooperative exposed to drought needs a different conversation from a cement producer exposed to a carbon price.
Each organisation sets its reporting currency once. Carbon cost, revenue impact and expected credit loss are then shown in it everywhere: the console, the scenario report, the Parquet files and the API.
| Organisation | Currency | Carbon cost | Revenue impact | PD Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank reporting in rand | ZAR | R 164 m | −3.1% | +19 bps |
| Bank reporting in shillings | KES | KSh 1.17 bn | −3.1% | +19 bps |
| Bank reporting in naira | NGN | ₦ 14.3 bn | −3.1% | +19 bps |
Transition risk answers the policy-side questions, one counterparty at a time, and adds them up for the book.
Rank the book by PD uplift and see the carbon cost and revenue change behind each one.
PD Δ · Delayed TransitionSum annual carbon cost by sector, in your reporting currency, with a range.
carbon cost · sector · ZARPlot physical against transition risk and pick out the corner where both are high.
physical × transitionRun all four scenarios side by side and carry the credit impact into a stress test and its report.
4 NGFS · stress testing · reportIn a working session we run a sample of your counterparties through a physical shock and a transition scenario, and walk you through every step of the chain from hazard to capital.